Paper detail

Inference-based semantics in Data Exchange

Data Exchange is an old problem that was firstly studied from a theoretical point of view only in 2003. Since then many approaches were considered when it came to the language describing the relationship between the source and the target schema. These approaches focus on what it makes a target instance a "good" solution for data-exchange. In this paper we propose the inference-based semantics that solves many certain-answer anomalies existing in current data-exchange semantics. To this we introduce a new mapping language between the source and the target schema based on annotated bidirectional dependencies (abd) and, consequently define the semantics for this new language. It is shown that the ABD-semantics can properly represent the inference-based semantics, for any source-to-target mappings. We discovered three dichotomy results under the new semantics for solution-existence, solution-check and UCQ evaluation problems. These results rely on two factors describing the annotation used in the mappings (density and cardinality). Finally we also investigate the certain-answers evaluation problem under ABD-semantics and discover many tractable classes for non-UCQ queries even for a subclass of CQ with negation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.