Paper detail

Infall and outflow motions in the high-mass star forming complex G9.62+0.19

We present the results of a high resolution study with the Submillimeter Array towards the massive star forming complex G9.62+0.19. Three sub-mm cores are detected in this region. The masses are 13, 30 and 165 M$_{\sun}$ for the northern, middle and southern dust cores, respectively. Infall motions are found with HCN (4-3) and CS (7-6) lines at the middle core (G9.62+0.19 E). The infall rate is $4.3\times10^{-3}~M_{\odot}\cdot$yr$^{-1}$. In the southern core, a bipolar-outflow with a total mass about 26 M$_{\sun}$ and a mass-loss rate of $3.6\times10^{-5}~M_{\odot}\cdot$yr$^{-1}$ is revealed in SO ($8_{7}-7_{7}$) line wing emission. CS (7-6) and HCN (4-3) lines trace higher velocity gas than SO ($8_{7}-7_{7}$). G9.62+0.19 F is confirmed to be the driving source of the outflow. We also analyze the abundances of CS, SO and HCN along the redshifted outflow lobes. The mass-velocity diagrams of the outflow lobes can be well fitted by a single power law. The evolutionary sequence of the cm/mm cores in this region are also analyzed. The results support that UC~H{\sc ii} regions have a higher blue excess than their precursors.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.