Paper detail

Inertia and spectral symmetry of eccentricity matrices of some clique trees

The eccentricity matrix $\mathcal E(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is obtained from the distance matrix of $G$ by leaving unchanged the largest nonzero entries in each row and each column, and replacing the remaining ones with zeros. In this paper, we consider the set $\mathcal C \mathcal T$ of clique trees whose blocks have at most two cut-vertices \textcolor{blue}{of the clique tree}. After proving the irreducibility of the eccentricity matrix of a clique tree in $\mathcal C \mathcal T$ and finding its inertia indices, we show that every graph in $\mathcal C \mathcal T$ with more than $4$ vertices and odd diameter has two positive and two negative $\mathcal E$-eigenvalues. Positive $\mathcal E$-eigenvalues and negative $\mathcal E$-eigenvalues turn out to be equal in number even for graphs in $\mathcal C \mathcal T$ with even diameter; that shared cardinality also counts the \textcolor{blue}{`diametrally distinguished'} vertices. Finally, we prove that the spectrum of the eccentricity matrix of a clique tree $G$ in $\mathcal C \mathcal T$ is symmetric with respect to the origin if and only if $G$ has an odd diameter and exactly two adjacent central vertices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.