Paper detail

Inequalities on stellar rotational splittings derived from assumptions on the rotation profile

Context: A number of pulsating stars with rotational splittings have been observed thanks to the CoRoT and Kepler missions. This is particularly true of evolved (sub-giant and giant) stars, and has led various groups to investigate their rotation profiles via different methods. Aims: We would like to set up some criteria which will help us to know whether a decreasing rotation profile, or one which satisfies Rayleigh's stability criterion, is compatible with a set of observed rotational splittings for a given reference model. Methods: We derive inequalities on the rotational splittings using a reformulated version of the equation which relates the splittings to the rotation profile and kernels. Results: These inequalities are tested out on some simple examples. The first examples show how they are able to reveal when a rotation profile is increasing somewhere or inconsistent with Rayleigh's criterion in a main sequence star, depending on the profile and the $\ell$ values of the splittings. The next example illustrates how a slight mismatch between an observed evolved star and a reference model can lead to erroneous conclusions about the rotation profile. We also show how frequency differences between the star and the model, which should normally reveal this mismatch, can be masked by frequency corrections for near-surface effects.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.