Paper detail

Inequalities and tail bounds for elementary symmetric polynomial with applications

We study the extent of independence needed to approximate the product of bounded random variables in expectation, a natural question that has applications in pseudorandomness and min-wise independent hashing. For random variables whose absolute value is bounded by $1$, we give an error bound of the form $σ^{Ω(k)}$ where $k$ is the amount of independence and $σ^2$ is the total variance of the sum. Previously known bounds only applied in more restricted settings, and were quanitively weaker. We use this to give a simpler and more modular analysis of a construction of min-wise independent hash functions and pseudorandom generators for combinatorial rectangles due to Gopalan et al., which also slightly improves their seed-length. Our proof relies on a new analytic inequality for the elementary symmetric polynomials $S_k(x)$ for $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ which we believe to be of independent interest. We show that if $|S_k(x)|,|S_{k+1}(x)|$ are small relative to $|S_{k-1}(x)|$ for some $k>0$ then $|S_\ell(x)|$ is also small for all $\ell > k$. From these, we derive tail bounds for the elementary symmetric polynomials when the inputs are only $k$-wise independent.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.