Paper detail

Inelastic charged current interaction of supernova neutrinos in two-phase liquid xenon dark matter detectors

It has been known that neutrinos from supernova (SN) bursts can give rise to nuclear recoil (NR) signals arising from coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$ν$NS) interaction, a neutral current (NC) process, of the neutrinos with xenon nuclei in future large (multi-ton scale) liquid xenon (LXe) detectors employed for dark matter search, depending on the SN progenitor mass and distance to the SN. In this paper, we show that the same detectors will also be sensitive to inelastic charged current (CC) interactions of the SN electron neutrinos ($ν_e$CC) with the xenon nuclei. Such interactions, while creating an electron in the final state, also leave the post-interaction target nucleus in an excited state, the subsequent deexcitation of which produces, among other particles, gamma rays and neutrons. The electron and deexcitation gamma rays will give ``electron recoil" (ER) type signals, while the deexcitation neutrons produce, through their multiple scattering on the xenon nuclei, further xenon nuclear recoils that will also give NR signals (in addition to those produced through the CE$ν$NS interactions). We discuss the observable scintillation and ionization signals associated with SN neutrino induced CE$ν$NS and $ν_e$CC events in a generic LXe detector and argue that upcoming sufficiently large LXe detectors should be able to detect both these types of events due to neutrinos from reasonably close by SN bursts. We also note that since the total CC induced ER and NR signals receive contributions predominantly from $ν_e$CC interactions while the CE$ν$NS contribution comes from NC interactions of {\emph all the six species of neutrinos}, identification of the $ν_e$CC and CE$ν$NS origin events may offer the possibility of extracting useful information about the distribution of the total SN explosion energy going into different neutrino flavors.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.