Paper detail

Inducing and Optimizing Magnetism in Graphene Nanomesh

Using first-principles calculations, we explore the electronic and magnetic properties of graphene nanomesh (GNM), a regular network of large vacancies, produced either by lithography or nanoimprint. When removing an equal number of A and B sites of the graphene bipartite lattice, the nanomesh made mostly of zigzag (armchair) type edges exhibit antiferromagnetic (spin unpolarized) states. In contrast, in situation of sublattice symmetry breaking, stable ferri(o)magnetic states are obtained. For hydrogen-passivated nanomesh, the formation energy is dramatically decreased, and ground state is found to strongly depend on the vacancies shape and size. For triangular shaped holes, the obtained net magnetic moments increase with the number difference of removed A and B sites in agreement with Lieb's theorem for even A+B. For odd A+B triangular meshes and all cases of non-triangular nanomeshes including the one with even A+B, Lieb's theorem does not hold anymore which can be partially attributed to introduction of armchair edges. In addition, large triangular shaped GNM could be as robust as non-triangular GNMs, providing possible solution to overcome one of crucial challenges for the sp-magnetism. Finally, significant exchange splitting values as large as $\sim 0.5$ eV can be obtained for highly asymmetric structures evidencing the potential of GNM for room temperature carbon based spintronics. These results demonstrate that a turn from 0-dimensional graphene nanoflakes throughout 1-dimensional graphene nanoribbons with zigzag edges to GNM breaks localization of unpaired electrons and provides deviation from the rules based on Lieb's theorem. Such delocalization of the electrons leads the switch of the ground state of system from antiferromagnetic narrow gap insulator discussed for graphene nanoribons to ferromagnetic or nonmagnetic metal.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.