Paper detail

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions I. Even-hole-free graphs of bounded degree

Treewidth is a parameter that emerged from the study of minor closed classes of graphs (i.e. classes closed under vertex and edge deletion, and edge contraction). It in some sense describes the global structure of a graph. Roughly, a graph has treewidth $k$ if it can be decomposed by a sequence of noncrossing cutsets of size at most $k$ into pieces of size at most $k+1$. The study of hereditary graph classes (i.e. those closed under vertex deletion only) reveals a different picture, where cutsets that are not necessarily bounded in size (such as star cutsets, 2-joins and their generalization) are required to decompose the graph into simpler pieces that are structured but not necessarily bounded in size. A number of such decomposition theorems are known for complex hereditary graph classes, including even-hole-free graphs, perfect graphs and others. These theorems do not describe the global structure in the sense that a tree decomposition does, since the cutsets guaranteed by them are far from being noncrossing. They are also of limited use in algorithmic applications. We show that in the case of even-hole-free graphs of bounded degree the cutsets described in the previous paragraph can be partitioned into a bounded number of well-behaved collections. This allows us to prove that even-hole-free graphs with bounded degree have bounded treewidth, resolving a conjecture of Aboulker, Adler, Kim, Sintiari and Trotignon [arXiv:2008.05504]. As a consequence, it follows that many algorithmic problems can be solved in polynomial time for this class, and that even-hole-freeness is testable in the bounded degree graph model of property testing. In fact we prove our results for a larger class of graphs, namely the class of $C_4$-free odd-signable graphs with bounded degree.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.