Paper detail

Induced gravitational wave background and primordial black holes

We calculate the frequency dependence of gravitational wave background arising at second order of cosmological perturbation theory due to mixing of tensor and scalar modes. The calculation of the induced gravitational background is performed for two special cases: for the power spectrum of scalar perturbations which has a peak at some scale and for the scalar spectrum predicted by the inflationary model with the running mass potential. We show that the amplitudes of the induced gravitational background, in the frequency region $\sim 10^{-3} - 10^3 $Hz, are effectively constrained by results of studies of primordial black hole production in early universe. We argue that though today's LIGO bound on ${\cal P}_{\cal R}(k)$ is weaker than the PBH one, Advanced LIGO will be able to set a stronger bound, and in future the ground-based interferometers of LIGO type will be suitable for obtaining constraints on PBH number density in the mass range $\sim 10^{11} - 10^{15}$ g.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.