Paper detail

Induced Disjoint Paths in Claw-Free Graphs

Paths P1,...,Pk in a graph G=(V,E) are said to be mutually induced if for any 1 <= i < j <= k, Pi and Pj have neither common vertices nor adjacent vertices (except perhaps their end-vertices). The Induced Disjoint Paths problem is to test whether a graph G with k pairs of specified vertices (si,ti) contains k mutually induced paths Pi such that Pi connects si and ti for i=1,...,k. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable for claw-free graphs when parameterized by k. Several related problems, such as the k-in-a-Path problem, are proven to be fixed-parameter tractable for claw-free graphs as well. We show that an improvement of these results in certain directions is unlikely, for example by noting that the Induced Disjoint Paths problem cannot have a polynomial kernel for line graphs (a type of claw-free graphs), unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. Moreover, the problem becomes NP-complete, even when k=2, for the more general class of K_1,4-free graphs. Finally, we show that the n^O(k)-time algorithm of Fiala et al. for testing whether a claw-free graph contains some k-vertex graph H as a topological induced minor is essentially optimal by proving that this problem is W[1]-hard even if G and H are line graphs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.