Paper detail

Individual Estimates of the Virial Factor in 10 Quasars: Implications on the Kinematics of the Broad Line Region

Assuming a gravitational origin for the Fe III$λλ$2039-2113 redshift and using microlensing based estimates of the size of the region emitting this feature, we obtain individual measurements of the virial factor, $f$, in 10 quasars. The average values for the Balmer lines, $\langle f_{Hβ}\rangle={\bf 0.43\pm 0.20}$ and $\langle f_{Hα}\rangle={\bf 0.50\pm 0.24}$, are in good agreement with the results of previous studies for objects with lines of comparable widths. In the case of Mg II, consistent results, $f_{Mg II} \sim {\bf 0.44}$, can be also obtained accepting a reasonable scaling for the size of the emitting region. The modeling of the cumulative histograms of individual measurements, $CDF(f)$, indicates a {relatively} high value for the ratio between isotropic and cylindrical motions, $a\sim {\bf 0.4}-0.7$. On the contrary, we find very large values of the virial factor associated to the Fe III$λλ$2039-2113 blend, $f_{FeIII}=14.3\pm2.4$, which can be explained if this feature arises from a flattened nearly face-on structure, similar to the accretion disk.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.