Paper detail

Individual and Team Trust Preferences for Robotic Swarm Behaviors

Trust between humans and multi-agent robotic swarms may be analyzed using human preferences. These preferences are expressed by an individual as a sequence of ordered comparisons between pairs of swarm behaviors. An individual's preference graph can be formed from this sequence. In addition, swarm behaviors may be mapped to a feature vector space. We formulate a linear optimization problem to locate a trusted behavior in the feature space. Extending to human teams, we define a novel distinctiveness metric using a sparse optimization formulation to cluster similar individuals from a collection of individuals' labeled pairwise preferences. The case of anonymized unlabeled pairwise preferences is also examined to find the average trusted behavior and minimum covariance bound, providing insights into group cohesion. A user study was conducted, with results suggesting that individuals with similar trust profiles can be clustered to facilitate human-swarm teaming.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.