Paper detail

Indistinguishability Obfuscation from Well-Founded Assumptions

In this work, we show how to construct indistinguishability obfuscation from subexponential hardness of four well-founded assumptions. We prove: Let $τ\in (0,\infty), δ\in (0,1), ε\in (0,1)$ be arbitrary constants. Assume sub-exponential security of the following assumptions, where $λ$ is a security parameter, and the parameters $\ell,k,n$ below are large enough polynomials in $λ$: - The SXDH assumption on asymmetric bilinear groups of a prime order $p = O(2^λ)$, - The LWE assumption over $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$ with subexponential modulus-to-noise ratio $2^{k^ε}$, where $k$ is the dimension of the LWE secret, - The LPN assumption over $\mathbb{Z}_p$ with polynomially many LPN samples and error rate $1/\ell^δ$, where $\ell$ is the dimension of the LPN secret, - The existence of a Boolean PRG in $\mathsf{NC}^0$ with stretch $n^{1+τ}$, Then, (subexponentially secure) indistinguishability obfuscation for all polynomial-size circuits exists.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.