Paper detail

Indirect detection prospects for d$^*$(2380) dark matter

A Bose-Einstein condensate of the hexaquark particle known as d$^*$(2380) has been recently proposed as a dark matter candidate by the authors in Bashkanov \& Watts 2020. This particle can produced in an abundant condensate state in the early universe and is argued to satisfy all the stability and weak interaction constraints of a viable dark matter candidate. This dark matter candidate is able to evade direct detection bounds and is suggested to have the best observational prospects in the form of indirect astrophysical emissions due to the decay of the d$^*$ condensate. In this work we test the indirect observational prospects of this form of dark matter and find that its low mass $\sim 2$ GeV mean that sub-GeV gamma-rays searches have the best prospects in the Milky-Way galactic centre where we find $Γ_{d^*} < 3.9 \times 10^{-24}$ s$^{-1}$, with current extra-galactic data from M31 and the Coma cluster producing constraints on the d$^*$ decay rate two orders of magnitude weaker. In dwarf galaxies we show that the future GAMMA-400 instrument has the potential to probe down to $Γ_{d^*} \sim 10^{-25}$ s$^{-1}$ with 4 years of exposure time.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.