Paper detail

Indifference pricing for Contingent Claims: Large Deviations Effects

We study utility indifference prices and optimal purchasing quantities for a non-traded contingent claim in an incomplete semi-martingale market with vanishing hedging errors. We make connections with the theory of large deviations. We concentrate on sequences of semi-complete markets where in the $n^{th}$ market, the claim $B_n$ admits the decomposition $B_n = D_n+Y_n$. Here, $D_n$ is replicable by trading in the underlying assets $S_n$, but $Y_n$ is independent of $S_n$. Under broad conditions, we may assume that $Y_n$ vanishes in accordance with a large deviations principle as $n$ grows. In this setting, for an exponential investor, we identify the limit of the average indifference price $p_n(q_n)$, for $q_n$ units of $B_n$, as $n\rightarrow \infty$. We show that if $|q_n|\rightarrow\infty$, the limiting price typically differs from the price obtained by assuming bounded positions $\sup_n|q_n|<\infty$, and the difference is explicitly identifiable using large deviations theory. Furthermore, we show that optimal purchase quantities occur at the large deviations scaling, and hence large positions arise endogenously in this setting.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.