Paper detail

Indications of the invalidity of the exponentiality of the disk within bulges of spiral galaxies

(abridged) A fundamental subject in Extragalactic Astronomy concerns the formation and evolution of late-type galaxies (LTGs). The standard scenario comprises the early assembly of the bulge followed by disk accretion. However, recent observational evidence points to a joint formation and perpetual co-evolution of these structural components. Our current knowledge on the properties of bulge and disk is mostly founded on photometric decomposition studies, which sensitively depend on the adopted methodology and enclosed assumptions on the structure of LTGs. A critical assumption whose validity was never questioned is that galactic disks conserve their exponential nature up to the galactic center. This implies that bulge and disk co-exist without significant dynamical interaction and mass exchange over nearly the entire Hubble time. Our goal is to examine the validity of the standard assumption that galactic disks preserve their exponential intensity profile inside the bulge radius all the way to the galactic center. We developed a spectrophotometric bulge-disk decomposition technique that provides an estimation for the net spectrum of the bulge. A systematic application of our spectrophotometric bulge-disk decomposition tool to a representative sample of 135 local LTGs from the CALIFA Survey yields a significant fraction (up to ~30%) of unphysical net-bulge spectra when a purely exponential intensity profile is assumed for the disk. The obtained results suggest that, for a significant fraction of LTGs, the disk component shows a down-bending beneath the bulge. If proven to be true, such result will call for a substantial revision of structural decomposition studies for LTGs and have far-reaching implications in our understanding of the photometric properties of their bulges.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.