Paper detail

Indications for a critical point in the phase diagram for hot and dense nuclear matter

Two-pion interferometry measurements are studied for a broad range of collision centralities in Au+Au (Root_s = 7.7 - 200 GeV) and Pb+Pb (Root_s = 2.76 TeV) collisions. They indicate non-monotonic excitation functions for the Gaussian emission source radii difference [(R_out)^2 - (R_side)^2], suggestive of reaction trajectories which spend a fair amount of time near a "soft point" in the equation of state (EOS) that coincides with the critical end point (CEP). A Finite-Size Scaling (FSS) analysis of these excitation functions, provides further validation tests for the CEP. It also indicates a second order phase transition at the CEP, and the values T^{cep} ~ 165 MeV and mu_B^{cep} ~ 95 MeV for its location in the (T, mu_B)-plane of the phase diagram. The static critical exponents (nu ~ 0.66 and gamma ~ 1.2) extracted via the same FSS analysis, place this CEP in the 3D Ising model universality class. A Dynamic Finite-Size Scaling analysis of the excitation functions, gives the estimate z ~ 0.87 for the dynamic critical exponent, suggesting that the associated critical expansion dynamics is dominated by the hydrodynamic sound mode.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.