Paper detail

Index sets for Finite Normal Predicate Logic Programs

<Q>_e is the effective list of all finite predicate logic programs. <T_e> is the list of recursive trees. We modify constructions of Marek, Nerode, and Remmel [25] to construct recursive functions f and g such that for all indices e, (i) there is a one-to-one degree preserving correspondence between the set of stable models of Q_e and the set of infinite paths through T_{f(e)} and (ii) there is a one-to-one degree preserving correspondence between the set of infinite paths through T_e and the set of stable models of Q_{g(e)}. We use these two recursive functions to reduce the problem of finding the complexity of the index set I_P for various properties P of normal finite predicate logic programs to the problem of computing index sets for primitive recursive trees for which there is a large variety of results [6], [8], [16], [17], [18], [19]. We use our correspondences to determine the complexity of the index sets of all programs and of certain special classes of finite predicate logic programs of properties such as (i) having no stable models, (ii) having at least one stable model, (iii) having exactly c stable models for any given positive integer c, (iv) having only finitely many stable models, or (vi) having infinitely many stable models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.