Paper detail

Independent-subsystem interpretation of the double photoionization of pyrene and coronene

It is shown that the M$^{2+}$ ion yield in the double photoionization of the aromatic hydrocarbons, pyrene and coronene, can be expressed as a superposition of a contribution from a resonance involving carbon atoms on the perimeter and coherent contributions from carbon atoms inside the perimeter. In the case of pyrene, the two interior atoms are associated with a resonance peak at 10 eV and linear behavior above 75 eV. The resonance peak is an optically excited state of the interior carbon pair. The linear behavior arises from the coherent emission of two electrons with equal energy and opposite momenta, as occurs in pyrrole. Coronene has a low energy peak along with two pairing resonances, however, the linear region as in the case of pyrene is absent. The low energy resonance is associated with the atoms on the perimeter and the high energy resonance is associated with the hexagonal array of six carbon atoms at the center of the molecule. It is proposed that the quasi-independence of the contributions from the perimeter and interior atoms is related to Hückel's Rule for the stability of aromatic hydrocarbons.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.