Paper detail

Independent evaluation of the significance of the recent ATLAS and CMS data

This note describes an independent assessment of the statistical significance of the recently released ATLAS and CMS data, about 11 fb-1 per experiment acquired in 2011 and in the first part of 2012, for what concerns the Higgs search in the two high resolution decay channels especially suited for the low mass region, i.e. the diphoton and four-lepton decay channels. Scope of this note is not to reproduce the analysis of the Collaborations: this would be impossible given the enormous complexity of the complete profile likelihood procedure used to evaluate local and global the p-values, and the huge number of nuisance parameters which are used to incorporate the numerous systematic effects. Rather, its purpose is to show the significance that an outsider can infer only on the basis of the released data and plots, used as input of a simplified profile likelihood procedure in which the only contemplated nuisance parameter is the background normalization in the diphoton channel. In practice, this note tries to address the question of the independent judgment of the significance of new data that physicists are used to perform on their own when they are shown for the first time particularly relevant results with indication of new effects, and that in the complex LHC framework is not so easily doable as in other experimental contexts.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.