Paper detail

Independent determination of the systematic and random errors of the proper motions in the PPMXL catalog using quasars

Using a sample of 117053 quasars identified in the PPMXL catalog, the systematic errors of the proper motions in the PPMXL catalog are estimated independently as -2.0 and -2.1 mas yr$^{-1}$ in $μ_α\cosδ$ and $μ_δ$, respectively. For objects with SDSS $r$ magnitude between 16.0 and 21.0 mag and SDSS $g-r$ color between -0.4 and 1.2, there are no obvious magnitude and color dependence in the systematic errors of the proper motions in the PPMXL catalog. The random errors of the proper motions in the PPMXL catalog change from $\sim4.0$ to $\sim8.0$ mas yr$^{-1}$ along with the increase of the magnitude of the objects. No color dependence in the random errors of the proper motions in the PPMXL catalog is found. There are obvious right ascension $α$ dependence of the systematic errors in both components of the proper motions in the PPMXL catalog. For quasars with declination $δ>0$, the systematic errors of $μ_δ$ in the PPMXL catalog increase linearly with $δ$ with a slope of 0.07 mas yr$^{-1}$ deg$^{-1}$. For comparison, using a subsample of quasars identified both in the PPMXL and SDSS DR7 catalogs, the systematic errors of the USNO-SDSS proper motions in the SDSS DR7 catalog are derived as 0.9 and 0.5 mas yr$^{-1}$ in $μ_α\cosδ$ and $μ_δ$, respectively. There are no obvious magnitude, color, and $α$ dependence in the systematic errors of the USNO-SDSS proper motions. For quasars with declination $δ>0$, the systematic errors of $μ_δ$ in the SDSS DR7 catalog increase linearly with $δ$ with a slope of 0.03. The random errors of the USNO-SDSS proper motions change from $\sim2.5$ to $\sim6.0$ mas yr$^{-1}$ along with the change of the magnitude and color of the objects.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.