Paper detail

Independent Component Analysis Over Galois Fields

We consider the framework of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) for the case where the independent sources and their linear mixtures all reside in a Galois field of prime order P. Similarities and differences from the classical ICA framework (over the Real field) are explored. We show that a necessary and sufficient identifiability condition is that none of the sources should have a Uniform distribution. We also show that pairwise independence of the mixtures implies their full mutual independence (namely a non-mixing condition) in the binary (P=2) and ternary (P=3) cases, but not necessarily in higher order (P>3) cases. We propose two different iterative separation (or identification) algorithms: One is based on sequential identification of the smallest-entropy linear combinations of the mixtures, and is shown to be equivariant with respect to the mixing matrix; The other is based on sequential minimization of the pairwise mutual information measures. We provide some basic performance analysis for the binary (P=2) case, supplemented by simulation results for higher orders, demonstrating advantages and disadvantages of the proposed separation approaches.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.