Paper detail

Independence number of generalized Petersen graphs

Determining the size of a maximum independent set of a graph $G$, denoted by $α(G)$, is an NP-hard problem. Therefore, many attempts are made to find upper and lower bounds, or exact values of $α(G)$ for special classes of graphs. This paper is aimed toward studying this problem for the class of generalized Petersen graphs. We find new upper and lower bounds and some exact values for $α(P(n,k))$. With a computer program we have obtained exact values for each $n<78$. In \cite{MR2381433} it is conjectured that $β(P(n, k)) \leq n + \lceil\frac{n}{5}\rceil $, for all $n$ and $k$. We prove this conjecture for some cases. In particular, we show that if $ n> 3k$, the conjecture is valid. We checked the conjecture with our table for $n < 78$ and it had no inconsistency. Finally, we show that for every fix $k$, $α(P(n, k))$ can be computed using an algorithm with running time O(n).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.