Indecomposability of entanglement witnesses constructed from any permutations

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let n≥2n\geq 2 and Φn,t,π:Mn(C)→Mn(C)Φ_{n,t,π}: M_n({\mathbb C}) \rightarrow M_n({\mathbb C}) be a linear map defined by Φn,t,π(A)=(n−t)∑i=1nEiiAEii+t∑i=1nEi,π(i)AEi,π(i)†−AΦ_{n,t,π}(A)=(n-t)\sum_{i=1}^nE_{ii}AE_{ii}+t\sum_{i=1}^nE_{i,π(i)}AE_{i,π(i)}^†-A, where 0≤t≤n0\leq t\leq n, EijE_{ij}s are the matrix units and ππ is a non-identity permutation of (1,2,⋯ ,n)(1,2,\cdots,n). Denote by {Fs:s=1,2…,k}\{{ F}_s: s=1,2\ldots, k\} the set of all minimal cycles of ππ and l(π)=max⁡{#Fs:s=1,2,…,k}l(π)=\max\{\# { F}_s: s=1,2,\ldots,k\} the length of ππ. It is shown that the Hermitian matrix Wn,t,πW_{n,t,π} induced by Φn,t,πΦ_{n,t,π} is an indecomposable entanglement witness if and only if π2≠idπ^2\not={\rm id} (the identity permutation) and 0<t≤nl(π)0<t\leq\frac{n}{l(π)}. Some new bounded entangled states are detected by such witnesses that cannot be distinguished by PPT criterion, realignment criterion, etc..

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.