Paper detail

Increasing subsequences of random walks

Given a sequence of $n$ real numbers $\{S_i\}_{i\leq n}$, we consider the longest weakly increasing subsequence, namely $i_1<i_2<\dots <i_L$ with $S_{i_k} \leq S_{i_{k+1}}$ and $L$ maximal. When the elements $S_i$ are i.i.d. uniform random variables, Vershik and Kerov, and Logan and Shepp proved that $\mathbb{E} L=(2+o(1)) \sqrt{n}$. We consider the case when $\{S_i\}_{i\leq n}$ is a random walk on $\mathbb{R}$ with increments of mean zero and finite (positive) variance. In this case, it is well known (e.g., using record times) that the length of the longest increasing subsequence satisfies $\mathbb{E} L\geq c\sqrt{n}$. Our main result is an upper bound $\mathbb{E} L\leq n^{1/2 + o(1)}$, establishing the leading asymptotic behavior. If $\{S_i\}_{i\leq n}$ is a simple random walk on $\mathbb{Z}$, we improve the lower bound by showing that $\mathbb{E} L \geq c\sqrt{n} \log{n}$. We also show that if $\{\mathbf{S}_i\}$ is a simple random walk in $\mathbb{Z}^2$, then there is a subsequence of $\{\mathbf{S}_i\}_{i\leq n}$ of expected length at least $cn^{1/3}$ that is increasing in each coordinate. The above one-dimensional result yields an upper bound of $n^{1/2 + o(1)}$. The problem of determining the correct exponent remains open.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.