Paper detail

Increased radiation events discovered at commercial aviation altitudes

We show fifty-seven enhanced radiation level events taken from new measurements on commercial altitude (greater than 9 km) aircraft that are analogous to planes flying through radiation clouds. More accurately, the plane is likely to be flying through a bremsstrahlung-origin gamma-ray beam. Evidence points to the beam being produced at higher altitudes by incident relativistic electrons coming from the Van Allen radiation belts and that have been generated by electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves. The EMIC waves have been inferred by ground observatory, aircraft air, and satellite space observations as well as from modeling. We do not rule out other radiation sources associated with geomagnetic substorms and radiation belt coupling although these enhanced radiation events seem to frequently occur even during very minor geomagnetic disturbed conditions. These events show a dynamic and variable radiation environment at aircraft altitudes in a narrow magnetic latitude band (43-67 N, S; L-shells between 2 and 7). Observations are of dose rate enhancements that are statistically significant above the galactic cosmic ray (GCR) background. Measurements indicate that between 11-12 km during quiet geomagnetic conditions and at L-shell 4, the effective dose rate can be 32 percent higher than from GCRs alone. For the events themselves the mean effective dose rate is nearly double that for the background GCR level. The implication is that background exposure rates for North Atlantic (NAT), North Pacific (NoPAC), and the northern half of continental U.S. (CONUS) air traffic routes are typically higher than if one only considers GCRs. The net effect on aircraft crew and frequent flyers for these routes will be an increase in the monthly and annual exposures, which may have career-limiting health consequences.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.