Paper detail

Incorporation of density scaling constraint in density functional design via contrastive representation learning

In a data-driven paradigm, machine learning (ML) is the central component for developing accurate and universal exchange-correlation (XC) functionals in density functional theory (DFT). It is well known that XC functionals must satisfy several exact conditions and physical constraints, such as density scaling, spin scaling, and derivative discontinuity. In this work, we demonstrate that contrastive learning is a computationally efficient and flexible method to incorporate a physical constraint in ML-based density functional design. We propose a schematic approach to incorporate the uniform density scaling property of electron density for exchange energies by adopting contrastive representation learning during the pretraining task. The pretrained hidden representation is transferred to the downstream task to predict the exchange energies calculated by DFT. The electron density encoder transferred from the pretraining task based on contrastive learning predicts exchange energies that satisfy the scaling property, while the model trained without using contrastive learning gives poor predictions for the scaling-transformed electron density systems. Furthermore, the model with pretrained encoder gives a satisfactory performance with only small fractions of the whole augmented dataset labeled, comparable to the model trained from scratch using the whole dataset. The results demonstrate that incorporating exact constraints through contrastive learning can enhance the understanding of density-energy mapping using neural network (NN) models with less data labeling, which will be beneficial to generalizing the application of NN-based XC functionals in a wide range of scenarios that are not always available experimentally but theoretically justified. This work represents a viable pathway toward the machine learning design of a universal density functional via representation learning.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.