Paper detail

Inconsistency of Chemical Properties of Stellar Populations in the Thick Disk Subsystem of Our Galaxy

Using modern published data on velocities and spectroscopic definitions of chemical elements in stellar objects of the Galaxy, we investigated the relationship of chemical composition with the kinematics of different populations. The paper shows that the old stellar populations of the Galaxy, belonging (by the kinematic criterion) to the thick disk subsystem---globular clusters, field variables of the type RR Lyrae (lyrids), as well as close F--G dwarfs and field giants, have different chemical composition. In particular, the dwarfs and giants of the field are on average more metallic than the globular clusters and lyrids of the field. Moreover, the relative abundances of $α$-elements in the range $\rm{[Fe/H]} > -1.0$ are the highest for globular clusters, and are the lowest for for field variables of the RR Lyrae type. Based on the analysis of the nature of the dependences of [$α$/Fe] on [Fe/H] for these objects it was suggested that the thick disk subsystem in the Galaxy is composite and at least three components exist independently within it. The oldest one includes metal-rich globular clusters that formed from a single proto-galactic cloud shortly after the start of type Ia supernovae outbursts. Then the subsystem of field stars of a thick disk was formed as a result of ``heating'' of stars of already formed thin disk of the Galaxy by a rather massive dwarf satellite galaxy that fell on it. And finally, subsystems of field stars with the kinematics of not only a thick, but even a thin disk that fell on the Galaxy from this captured satellite galaxy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.