Paper detail

Inconsistencies in the Notions of Acoustic Stress and Streaming

Inviscid hydrodynamics mediates forces through pressure and other, typically irrotational, external forces. Acoustically induced forces must be consistent with arising from such a pressure field. The use of "acoustic stress" is shown to have inconsistencies with such an analysis and generally arise from mathematical expediency but poor overall conceptualization of such systems. This contention is further supported by the poor agreement of experiment in many such approaches. The notion of momentum as being an intrinsic property of sound waves is similarly found to be paradoxical. Through an analysis that includes viscosity and attenuation, we conclude that all acoustic streaming must arise from vorticity introduced by viscous forces at the driver or other solid boundaries and that calculations with acoustic stress should be replaced with ones using a nonlinear correction to the overall pressure field.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.