Paper detail

Incomplete-exclusion Statistical Mechanics in Non-collisional Violent Relaxation of Celestial Objects

Violent relaxation has been proposed half a century ago to bear responsibility for non-collisional dynamics and formation of gravitationally bound systems of extended celestial objects (agglomeration of stars, galaxies, clusters of galaxies) when reaching an approximate equilibrium state which can be described thermodynamically. The Lynden-Bell equilibrium distribution of such systems, resulting from a spatial exclusion principle, had been shown to be an analog to the Fermi distribution of states in solid state physics. Real extended objects like galaxies do not completely exclude each other, however. Permitting for partial exclusion leads to a modification of the equilibrium distribution. Here we show that this case can be treated in analogy to a hypothetical incomplete population of Fermi states. An incomplete-exclusion equilibrium distribution is obtained which enters the violent relaxation theory.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.