Paper detail

Incidences in Three Dimensions and Distinct Distances in the Plane

We first describe a reduction from the problem of lower-bounding the number of distinct distances determined by a set $S$ of $s$ points in the plane to an incidence problem between points and a certain class of helices (or parabolas) in three dimensions. We offer conjectures involving the new setup, but are still unable to fully resolve them. Instead, we adapt the recent new algebraic analysis technique of Guth and Katz \cite{GK}, as further developed by Elekes et al. \cite{EKS}, to obtain sharp bounds on the number of incidences between these helices or parabolas and points in $\reals^3$. Applying these bounds, we obtain, among several other results, the upper bound $O(s^3)$ on the number of rotations (rigid motions) which map (at least) three points of $S$ to three other points of $S$. In fact, we show that the number of such rotations which map at least $k\ge 3$ points of $S$ to $k$ other points of $S$ is close to $O(s^3/k^{12/7})$. One of our unresolved conjectures is that this number is $O(s^3/k^2)$, for $k\ge 2$. If true, it would imply the lower bound $Ω(s/\log s)$ on the number of distinct distances in the plane.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.