Paper detail

Incidence of Mg II absorption systems towards flat-spectrum radio quasars

The conventional wisdom that the rate of incidence of Mg II absorption systems, dN/dz (excluding `associated systems' having velocity beta*c relative to the AGN of less than ~5000 km/s) is totally independent of the background AGN, has been challenged by a recent finding that dN/dz for strong Mg II absorption systems towards distant blazars is 2.2 \pm_{0.6}^{0.8} times the value known for normal optically-selected quasars (QSOs). This has led to the suggestion that a significant fraction of even the absorption systems with beta as high as 0.1 may have been ejected by the relativistic jets in the blazars, which are expected to be pointed close to our direction. Here we investigate this scenario using a large sample of 115 flat-spectrum radio-loud quasars (FSRQs) which too possess powerful jets, but are only weakly polarized. We show, for the first time, that dN/dz towards FSRQs is, on the whole, quite similar to that known for QSOs and the comparative excess of strong \mgii absorption systems seen towards blazars is mainly confined to beta< 0.15. The excess relative to FSRQs can probably result from a likely closer alignment of blazar jets with our direction and hence any gas clouds accelerated by them are more likely to be on the line of sight to the active quasar nucleus.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.