Paper detail

Incidence of high-amplitude delta Scuti type variable stars

An order-of-magnitude estimate for the incidence of high-amplitude delta Scuti-type variable stars (HADS) in the delta Scuti area of the H-R diagram is calculated. Using a model for the stellar distribution in the Milky Way, we calculate the number of stars that are expected to fall in the delta Scuti area of the H-R diagram within the magnitude range and sky coverage of the ROTSE Survey for Variables I (RSV1). The incidence of the HADS phenomenon is then obtained by comparing the number of stars calculated by the model and the actual, observed number of HADS in the RSV1. We find that ~0.3 % of the stars that lie in the delta Scuti area of the H-R diagram within the RSV1 observational limits exhibit the HADS phenomenon. This number is much lower than the incidence of the low-amplitude delta Scuti stars (LADS), ~>1/3, implying that the HADS phenomenon takes place in a very small fraction of stars and/or its duration is very short, compared to the LADS.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.