Paper detail

Inappropriate use of L-BFGS, Illustrated on frame field design

L-BFGS is a hill climbing method that is guarantied to converge only for convex problems. In computer graphics, it is often used as a black box solver for a more general class of non linear problems, including problems having many local minima. Some works obtain very nice results by solving such difficult problems with L-BFGS. Surprisingly, the method is able to escape local minima: our interpretation is that the approximation of the Hessian is smoother than the real Hessian, making it possible to evade the local minima. We analyse the behavior of L-BFGS on the design of 2D frame fields. It involves an energy function that is infinitly continuous, strongly non linear and having many local minima. Moreover, the local minima have a clear visual interpretation: they corresponds to differents frame field topologies. We observe that the performances of LBFGS are almost unpredictables: they are very competitive when the field is sampled on the primal graph, but really poor when they are sampled on the dual graph.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.