Paper detail

In vivo compaction dynamics of bacterial DNA: A fingerprint of DNA/RNA demixing ?

The volume occupied by unconstrained bacterial DNA in physiological solutions exceeds 1000 times the volume of the cell. Still, it is confined to a well defined region of the cell called the nucleoid, which occupies only a fraction of the cell volume. There is still no general agreement on the mechanism leading to the compaction of the DNA and the formation of the nucleoid. However, advances in in vivo sub-wavelength resolution microscopy techniques have recently allowed the observation of the nucleoid at an unprecedented level of detail. In particular, these observations show that the compaction of the nucleoid is not static but is instead a highly dynamic feature, which depends on several factors, like the richness of the nutrient, the cell cycle stage, temperature, the action of an osmotic shock or antibiotics, etc. After a short description of the electrolyte content of the cytosol and a brief overview of the different mechanisms that may lead to the formation of the nucleoid, this paper reviews some of the most fascinating recent results of in vivo sub-wavelength resolution microscopy. It is furthermore argued that these observations provide converging indications in favor of a model that describes the cytosol as an aqueous electrolyte solution containing several macromolecular species, where demixing and segregative phase separation occur between DNA and RNA (essentially rRNA and mRNA involved in translation complexes, but also the large amounts of rRNA synthesized at the rrn operons of cells growing in rich media). It is also pointed out that crowding may play a crucial role through its synergy with electrostatic forces. By constraining macromolecules to remain at short distances from one another and feel electrostatic interactions in spite of the strong screening exerted by electrolyte species, crowding favors stronger DNA/RNA demixing and nucleoid compaction.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.