Paper detail

In search of massive single-population Globular Clusters

Most Globular Clusters so far examined host (at least) two stellar populations. This feature requires a two--step process, in which the nuclearly processed matter from a first generation (FG) of stars gives birth to a second generation (SG) bearing the fingerprint of a fully CNO-cycled matter. Since the present population of most globular clusters is made up largely of SG stars, a substantial fraction of the FG (>~90%) must be lost. Nevertheless, two types of clusters dominated by a simple stellar population (FG clusters) should exist: either clusters initially too small to be able to retain a cooling flow and form a SG (FG-only clusters), or massive clusters that could retain the CNO processed ejecta and form a SG, but were unable to lose a significant fraction of their FG (mainly-FG clusters). We attempt a classification of FG clusters, based on the morphology of their horizontal branches (HBs), as displayed in photomectric catalogues for 106 clusters. FG candidates are the clusters in which the HB can be reproduced by the evolution of an almost unique mass. <20% of clusters with [Fe/H]<-0.8 appear to be FG, but only ~10% probably had a mass sufficient to form at all an SG. This small percentage confirms on a wider database that the SG is a dominant constituent of today's clusters, suggesting that its formation is an ingredient necessary for the survival of globular clusters during their dynamical evolution in the Galactic tidal field. Pal3 turns out to be a good example of FG-only cluster. HB simulations and space distribution of its components, indicate that M 53 is a "mainly-FG" cluster. Mainly-FG candidates may be also NGC5634, NGC5694 and NGC6101. In contrast, NGC 2419 contains >30% of SG stars, and its present dynamical status bears less information on its formation process than the analysis of the chemical abundances of its stars and of its HB morphology.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.