Paper detail

In Search for Infall Motion in molecular clumps II: HCO+ (1-0) and HCN (1-0) Observations toward a Sub-sample of Infall Candidates

Gravitational accretion accumulates the original mass, and this process is crucial for us to understand the initial phases of star formation. Using the specific infall profiles in optically thick and thin lines, we searched the clumps with infall motion from the Milky Way Imaging Scroll Painting (MWISP) CO data in previous work. In this study, we selected 133 sources of them as a sub-sample for further research and identification. The excitation temperatures of these sources are between 7.0 and 38.5 K, while the H_2 column densities are between 10^21 and 10^23 cm^-2. We have observed optically thick lines HCO+ (1-0) and HCN (1-0) using the DLH 13.7-m telescope, and found 56 sources of them with blue profile and no red profile in these two lines, which are likely to have infall motions, with the detection rate of 42\%. It suggests that using CO data to restrict sample can effectively improve the infall detection rate. Among these confirmed infall sources, there are 43 associated with Class 0/I young stellar objects (YSOs), and 13 are not. These 13 sources are probably associated with the sources in earlier evolutionary stage. By comparison, the confirmed sources which are associated with Class 0/I YSOs have higher excitation temperatures and column densities, while the other sources are colder and have lower column densities. Most infall velocities of the sources we confirmed are between 10^-1 to 10^0 km s^-1, which is consistent with previous studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.