Paper detail

In ice radio detection of GZK neutrinos

Models for the source and propagation of cosmic rays are stressed by observations of cosmic rays with energies $E>10^{20}$ eV. A key discriminant between different models may be complementary observations of neutrinos with energies $E>10^{18}$ eV. Independent of the source of the cosmic rays, neutrinos are produced during propagation via the GZK mechanism. Event rates for GZK neutrinos are expected to be in the range of $0.01-0.1$ per km$^3$ yr, suggesting a detector mass in excess of 1 Eg. Detection of radio cherenkov emission from showers produced in Antarctic ice may be an economical way to instrument such a large mass. It is suggested that a 100 km$^2$ array of antennas centered on Icecube may allow confirmation of the radio technique and also increase the science achievable with Icecube by providing vertex information for events with throughgoing muons.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.