Paper detail

Impurity temperature screening in stellarators close to quasisymmetry

Impurity temperature screening is a favorable neoclassical phenomenon involving an outward radial flux of impurity ions from the core of fusion devices. Quasisymmetric magnetic fields are intrinsically ambipolar and give rise to temperature screening for low enough $η^{-1}\equiv d\ln n/d\ln T$. In contrast, neoclassical fluxes in generic stellarators will depend on the radial electric field, which is predicted to be inward for ion-root plasmas, potentially leading to impurity accumulation. Here we examine the impurity particle flux in a number of approximately quasisymmetric stellarator configurations and parameter regimes while varying the amount of symmetry-breaking in the magnetic field. The amount of symmetry-breaking (from perfect quasisymmetry) required to lose temperature screening is dependent on the particular configuration and flux surface. Neoclassical fluxes have been obtained using the SFINCS drift-kinetic equation solver with the electrostatic potential $Φ=Φ(ψ)$, where $ψ$ is a flux surface label. Results indicate that achieving temperature screening is possible, but unlikely, at reactor-relevant conditions in the core. Thus, the small departures from symmetry in nominally quasisymmetric stellarators are large enough to significantly alter the neoclassical impurity transport. A further look at these fluxes when compared to a gyro-Bohm turbulence estimate suggests that neoclassical fluxes are small in optimized configurations compared to turbulent fluxes. Therefore, although neoclassical impurity accumulation is expected in most situations, the strength of the turbulence may render this irrelevant.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.