Paper detail

Improving thermal stability of MnN/CoFeB exchange bias systems by optimizing the Ta buffer layer

We investigated the influence of the Ta buffer layer on the thermal stability of polycrystalline Ta/ MnN/ CoFeB exchange bias systems, showing high exchange bias of about 1800 Oe at room temperature. The thermal stability of those trilayer systems is limited by nitrogen diffusion that occurs during annealing processes. Most of the nitrogen diffuses into the Ta buffer layer, which is necessary for good crystal growth of MnN and thus a crucial component of the exchange bias system. In order to improve the thermal stability, we prepared exchange bias stacks where we varied the Ta thickness to look for an optimum value that guarantees stable and high exchange over a broad temperature range. Our findings show that thin layers of 2-5 nm Ta indeed support stable exchange bias up to annealing temperatures of more than $550^{\circ}$C. Furthermore, we found that the introduction of a TaN$_{\text{x}}$ layer between MnN and Ta, acting as a barrier, can prevent nitrogen diffusion. However, our results show that those measures, even though being beneficial in terms of thermal stability, often lead to decreased crystallinity and thus lower the exchange bias.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.