Paper detail

Improving the RSM map exoplanet detection algorithm: PSF forward modelling and optimal selection of PSF subtraction techniques

High-contrast imaging (HCI) is one of the most challenging techniques for exoplanet detection. It relies on sophisticated data processing to reach high contrasts at small angular separations. Most data processing techniques of this type are based on the angular differential imaging (ADI) observing strategy to perform the reference PSF subtraction, and generally make use of signal-to-noise (S/N) maps to infer the existence of planetary signals via thresholding. An alternative method for generating the final detection map was recently proposed with the regime-switching model (RSM) map, which uses a regime-switching framework to generate a probability map based on cubes of residuals generated by different PSF subtraction techniques. In this paper, we present several improvements to the original RSM map, focusing on novel PSF subtraction techniques and their optimal combinations, as well as a new procedure for estimating the probabilities involved. We started by implementing two forward-model versions of the RSM map algorithm based on the LOCI and KLIP PSF subtraction techniques. We then addressed the question of optimally selecting the PSF subtraction techniques to optimise the overall performance of the RSM map. A new forward-backward approach was also implemented to take into account both past and future observations to compute the RSM map probabilities, leading to improved precision in terms of astrometry and lowering the background speckle noise. We tested the ability of these various improvements to increase the performance of the RSM map based on different data sets via a computation of ROC curves. These results demonstrate the benefits of these proposed improvements. Finally, we present a new framework to generate contrast curves based on probability maps. The contrast curves highlight the higher performance of the RSM map compared to a standard S/N map at small angular separations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.