Paper detail

Improving the accuracy of the energy estimation by combining quantum annealing with classical computation

Quantum chemistry calculations are important applications of quantum annealing. For practical applications in quantum chemistry, it is essential to estimate a ground state energy of the Hamiltonian with chemical accuracy. However, there are no known methods to guarantee the accuracy of the estimation of the energy calculated by quantum annealing. Here, we propose a way to improve the accuracy of the estimate of the ground state energy by combining quantum annealing with classical computation. In our scheme, before running the QA, we need a pre-estimation of the energies of the ground state and first excited state with some error bars (corresponding to possible estimation error) by performing classical computation with some approximations. We show that, if an expectation value and variance of the energy of the state after the QA are smaller than certain threshold values (that we can calculate from the pre-estimation), the QA provides us with a better estimate of the ground state energy than that of the pre-estimation. Since the expectation value and variance of the energy can be experimentally measurable by the QA, our results pave the way for accurate estimation of the ground state energy with the QA.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.