Paper detail

Improving Tese Case Generation for Python Native Libraries Through Constraints on Input Data Structures

Modern Python projects execute computational functions using native libraries and give Python interfaces to boost execution speed; hence, testing these libraries becomes critical to the project's robustness. One challenge is that existing approaches use coverage to guide generation, but native libraries run as black boxes to Python code with no execution information. Another is that dynamic binary instrumentation reduces testing performance as it needs to monitor both native libraries and the Python virtual machine. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose an automated test case generation approach that works at the Python code layer. Our insight is that many path conditions in native libraries are for processing input data structures through interacting with the VM. In our approach, we instrument the Python Interpreter to monitor the interactions between native libraries and VM, derive constraints on the structures, and then use the constraints to guide test case generation. We implement our approach in a tool named PyCing and apply it to six widely-used Python projects. The experimental results reveal that with the structure constraint guidance, PyCing can cover more execution paths than existing test cases and state-of-the-art tools. Also, with the checkers in the testing framework Pytest, PyCing can identify segmentation faults in 10 Python interfaces and memory leaks in 9. Our instrumentation strategy also has an acceptable influence on testing efficiency.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.