Paper detail

Improving Short Utterance PLDA Speaker Verification using SUV Modelling and Utterance Partitioning Approach

This paper analyses the short utterance probabilistic linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) speaker verification with utterance partitioning and short utterance variance (SUV) modelling approaches. Experimental studies have found that instead of using single long-utterance as enrolment data, if long enrolled utterance is partitioned into multiple short utterances and average of short utterance i-vectors is used as enrolled data, that improves the Gaussian PLDA (GPLDA) speaker verification. This is because short utterance i-vectors have speaker, session and utterance variations, and utterance-partitioning approach compensates the utterance variation. Subsequently, SUV-PLDA is also studied with utterance partitioning approach, and utterance partitioning-based SUV-GPLDA system shows relative improvement of 9% and 16% in EER for NIST 2008 and NIST 2010 truncated 10sec-10sec evaluation condition as utterance partitioning approach compensates the utterance variation and SUV modelling approach compensates the mismatch between full-length development data and short-length evaluation data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.