Paper detail

Improving probability selecting based weights for Satisfiability Problem

The Boolean Satisfiability problem (SAT) is important on artificial intelligence community and the impact of its solving on complex problems. Recently, great breakthroughs have been made respectively on stochastic local search (SLS) algorithms for uniform random k-SAT resulting in several state-of-the-art SLS algorithms Score2SAT, YalSAT, ProbSAT, CScoreSAT and on a hybrid algorithm for hard random SAT (HRS) resulting in one state-of-the-art hybrid algorithm SparrowToRiss. However, there is no an algorithm which can effectively solve both uniform random k-SAT and HRS. In this paper, we present a new SLS algorithm named SelectNTS for uniform random k-SAT and HRS. SelectNTS is an improved probability selecting based local search algorithm for SAT problem. The core of SelectNTS relies on new clause and variable selection heuristics. The new clause selection heuristic uses a new clause weighting scheme and a biased random walk. The new variable selection heuristic uses a probability selecting strategy with the variation of CC strategy based on a new variable weighting scheme. Extensive experimental results on the well-known random benchmarks instances from the SAT Competitions in 2017 and 2018, and on randomly generated problems, show that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art random SAT algorithms, and our SelectNTS can effectively solve both uniform random k-SAT and HRS.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.