Paper detail

Improving PIE's performance over high-delay paths

Bufferbloat is excessive latency due to over- provisioned network buffers. PIE and CoDel are two recently proposed Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms, designed to tackle bufferbloat by lowering the queuing delay without degrading the bottleneck utilization. PIE uses a proportional integral controller to maintain the average queuing delay at a desired level; however, large Round Trip Times (RTT) result in large spikes in queuing delays, which induce high dropping probability and low utilization. To deal with this problem, we propose Maximum and Average queuing Delay with PIE (MADPIE). Loosely based on the drop policy used by CoDel to keep queuing delay bounded, MADPIE is a simple extension to PIE that adds deterministic packet drops at controlled intervals. By means of simulations, we observe that our proposed change does not affect PIE&#39;s performance when RTT < 100 ms. The deterministic drops are more dominant when the RTT increases, which results in lower maximum queuing delays and better performance for VoIP traffic and small file downloads, with no major impact on bulk transfers.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.