Paper detail

Improving on the Cut-Set Bound via Geometric Analysis of Typical Sets

We consider the discrete memoryless symmetric primitive relay channel, where, a source $X$ wants to send information to a destination $Y$ with the help of a relay $Z$ and the relay can communicate to the destination via an error-free digital link of rate $R_0$, while $Y$ and $Z$ are conditionally independent and identically distributed given $X$. We develop two new upper bounds on the capacity of this channel that are tighter than existing bounds, including the celebrated cut-set bound. Our approach significantly deviates from the standard information-theoretic approach for proving upper bounds on the capacity of multi-user channels. We build on the blowing-up lemma to analyze the probabilistic geometric relations between the typical sets of the $n$-letter random variables associated with a reliable code for communicating over this channel. These relations translate to new entropy inequalities between the $n$-letter random variables involved. As an application of our bounds, we study an open question posed by (Cover, 1987), namely, what is the minimum needed $Z$-$Y$ link rate $R_0^*$ in order for the capacity of the relay channel to be equal to that of the broadcast cut. We consider the special case when the $X$-$Y$ and $X$-$Z$ links are both binary symmetric channels. Our tighter bounds on the capacity of the relay channel immediately translate to tighter lower bounds for $R_0^*$. More interestingly, we show that when $p\to 1/2$, $R_0^*\geq 0.1803$; even though the broadcast channel becomes completely noisy as $p\to 1/2$ and its capacity, and therefore the capacity of the relay channel, goes to zero, a strictly positive rate $R_0$ is required for the relay channel capacity to be equal to the broadcast bound.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.