Paper detail

Improving measurements of H(z) and Da(z) by analyzing clustering anisotropies

The baryonic acoustic feature in galaxy clustering is a promising tool for constraining the nature of the cosmic acceleration, through measurements of expansion rates H and angular diameter distances D_A. Angle-averaged measurements of clustering yield constraints on the quantity D_A^2/H. However, to break the degeneracy between these two parameters one must measure the anisotropic correlation function as a function of both line-of-sight (radial) and transverse separations. Here we investigate how to most effectively do so, using analytic techniques and mock catalogues. In particular, we examine multipole expansions of the correlation function as well as "clustering wedges" xi(Delta mu, s), where mu = s_||/s and s_|| is the radial component of separation s. Both techniques allow strong constraints on H and D_A, as expected. The radial wedges strongly depend on H and the transverse wedges are sensitive to D_A. Analyses around the region of the acoustic peak constrain H ~20% better when using the wedge statistics than when using the monopole-quadrupole combination. However, we show that the hexadecapole allows substantially stronger constraints than the monopole and quadrupole alone. Our findings here demonstrate that wedge statistics provide a practical alternative technique to multipoles, that should be useful to test systematics and will provide comparable or better constraints. Finally, we predict the constraints from galaxy clustering that will be possible with a completed version of the ongoing Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.