Paper detail

Improving Lower Bound on Opaque Set for Equilateral Triangle

An opaque set (or a barrier) for $U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ is a set $B$ of finite-length curves such that any line intersecting $U$ also intersects $B$. In this paper, we consider the lower bound for the shortest barrier when $U$ is the unit equilateral triangle. The known best lower bound for triangles is the classic one by Jones [Jones,1964], which exhibits that the length of the shortest barrier for any convex polygon is at least the half of its perimeter. That is, for the unit equilateral triangle, it must be at least $3/2$. Very recently, this lower bounds are improved for convex $k$-gons for any $k\geq 4$ [Kawamura et al. 2014], but the case of triangles still lack the bound better than Jones' one. The main result of this paper is to fill this missing piece: We give the lower bound of $3/2 + 5 \cdot 10^{-13}$ for the unit-size equilateral triangle. The proof is based on two new ideas, angle-restricted barriers and a weighted sum of projection-cover conditions, which may be of independently interest.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.