Paper detail

Improving INTEGRAL/SPI data analysis of GRBs

INTEGRAL/SPI is a coded mask instrument observing since 2002 in the keV to MeV energy range, which covers the peak of the $νFν$ spectrum of most Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). Since its launch in 2008, Fermi/GBM has been the primary instrument for analyzing GRBs in the energy range between $\approx$ 10 keV to $\approx$ 10 MeV. Herein, we show that SPI, covering a similar energy range, can give equivalently constraining results for some parameters if we use an advanced analysis method. Also, combining the data of both instruments reduces the allowed parameter space in spectral fits. The main advantage of SPI as compared to GBM is the energy resolution of $\approx$ 0.2\% at 1.3 MeV compared to $\approx$ 10\% for GBM. Therefore, SPI is an ideal instrument to precisely measure the curvature of the spectrum. This is important, as it has been shown in recent years that physical models rather than heuristic functions should be fit to GRB data to obtain better insights into their still unknown emission mechanism, and the curvature of the peak is unique to the different physical models. To fit physical models to SPI GRB data and get the maximal amount of information from the data, we developed a new open source analysis software {\tt PySPI}. We apply these new techniques to GRB 120711A in order to validate and showcase {\tt PySPI}'s capabilities. We show that {\tt PySPI} improves the analysis of SPI GRB data compared to the {\tt OSA} analysis. In addition, we demonstrate that the GBM and the SPI data of this GRB can be fitted well with a physical synchrotron model. This evinces that SPI can play an important role in GRB spectral model fitting.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.